Blog

Tesler's Law: Understanding the Laws of UX and Legal Design

Explore Tesler's Law and its impact on legal design in this insightful article. Learn how complexity and simplicity intersect in user experience and contract design

Laws of UX and Legal Design: Tesler’s Law

💡 People want more. People want to have more easily. You can’t have both.

Welcome to the second episode of our Laws of UX series. This article will look at Tesler’s Law and its relation to legal design.

What is Tesler’s Law

Tesler’s Law, also known as The Law of Conservation of Complexity, states that for any system, there is a certain amount of complexity that can’t be reduced by any means.

Removing functionality doesn’t make something simpler because it eliminates options. Simplifying contracts by eliminating words and even clauses makes contracts inadequate. If you want to simplify things, you need to change the conceptual model of it.

Origins

While working for Xerox PARC in the mid-1980s, Larry Tesler realized how users interacted with applications was just as important as the application itself. The book Designing for Interaction by Dan Saffer includes an interview with Larry Tesler that describes the law of conservation of complexity. The interview is popular among user experience and interaction designers. Larry Tesler argues that, in most cases, an engineer should spend an extra week reducing the complexity of an application versus making millions of users spend an extra minute using the program because of the additional complexity.

However, Bruce Tognazzini proposes that people resist reductions to the amount of complexity in their lives. Thus, users begin attempting more complex tasks when an application is simplified.

Contract and complexity correlation

So even though you simplify the contract, if you end up minimizing the contract, your work will be somewhat useless and may not meet the required expectation.

Illustration of an airplane interior design
Image by pch.vector on Freepik

When you look at the interior of an Airbus A380, a massive toy carrying 850 passengers, a novice sees complexity. A pilot sees various tools, each of which is simple to use.

Take a moment and think about applying legal design principles to a trilateral treaty of obligations or market regulation contracts. These types of legal drafts are complex-by-design and complex by default. You can’t simplify the whole part of the contract because it contains a higher level of legal or financial knowledge.

Page of a complex contract
Sometimes you need to keep complexity in order to achieve the desired result and not to cause disharmony between the parties.

Simple doesn’t equal minimal.

Suppose you’re a data protection officer and regulate thousands of data from one of the most comprehensive data privacy management software such as OneTrust. In that case, you will see its complexity is essential to reduce the possibility of a data breach. You just can’t simplify and make the product “minimal.”

Imagine a complete workflow of OneTrust, Data Privacy Management Software. You cannot simplify this software because you will eventually not simplify it, but rather minimize it. And this is not something we want to do.

Why Tesler’s Law Matters

Instead of simplifying the contract by applying legal design principles, you may cause essential parts of the contract to be missing and inadequate. Creating such a gap would be incompatible with legal design principles as it would not ensure the parties correctly understand the intended message.

The Importance of Clear Language in Legal Services: Improving the User Experience
The Importance of Clear Language in Legal Services: Improving the User Experience

Discover how UX writing principles can improve the user experience in legal designs. Learn how to create clear, concise and usable content that builds trust and increases usability. Apply these principles to create products that sound human and resonate with your audience.

href=/en/learn/articles/clear-language-in-legal-services class="text-primary hover:underline inline-flex items-center gap-1" >
Laws of UX and Legal Design: Serial Position Effect
Laws of UX and Legal Design: Serial Position Effect

Discover the impact of the Serial Position Effect on user experience and legal design. Learn how strategically placing information in contracts improves recall and enhances the overall experience.

href=/en/learn/articles/laws-of-ux-and-legal-design-serial-position-effect class="text-primary hover:underline inline-flex items-center gap-1" >
The Power of Similarity: Enhancing UX and Legal Design with the Law of Similarity
The Power of Similarity: Enhancing UX and Legal Design with the Law of Similarity

Discover how the Law of Similarity improves the user experience. Learn how using color, shapes, and sizes creates a cohesive visual experience and prevent users from overlooking important information in contracts.

href=/en/learn/articles/the-power-of-similarity-enhancing-ux-and-legal-design-with-the-law-of-similarity class="text-primary hover:underline inline-flex items-center gap-1" >